The taintedblood.info timeline - what really happened...
"To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay, right or justice."
Magna Carta - 15th June, 1215
In 1958, Dr J. Garrott Allen conducts a survey in the Chicago area where he discovers what he refers to as the “prison effect”. He finds that there is 10 times more hepatitis in patients who had received blood transfusions from ‘professional’ paid-for blood than in patients who received transfusions from volunteer-donated blood. Dr Allen, warns that plasma centres and blood banks would have to quickly change their methods of operation. |
Source:
Douglas Starr, “Blood - An Epic History of Medicine and Commerce” Type: Survey Location: USA Find related entries |
Blood from Scottish prisoners is used in NHS transfusions despite serious concerns that the practice is unsafe. |
Source:
The Sunday Herald, Liam McDougall, Home Affairs Editor, 23 January 2005 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4201253.stm Type: Action - Press Location: Scotland Find related entries |
Confidential minutes from meetings held by directors of Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service show increasing quantities of blood taken from American troops stationed in UK.
Note: |
Source:
The Sunday Herald, Liam McDougall, Home Affairs Editor, 23 January 2005 http://www.sundayherald.com/47265 Type: Minutes Location: Scotland Find related entries |
In a meeting in 1983, SNBTS Directors warn that the Medicines Inspector has commented adversely on the practice of collecting blood from prisons and borstal institutions. It is reported by all Directors present that sessions were held in penal institutions in all regions. |
Source:
Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Minutes of Directors' Meeting, SNBTS Headquarters Unit. 29 March 1983 http://www.taintedblood.info/files/MINS_OF_DIRECTORS_MEETING_HQ_29_MAR_1983.pdf Type: SNBTS Minutes March 29, 1983 Location: Scotland Find related entries |
In a DHSS Circular from 27 July 1983, we learn that the Medicines Division's Inspection Action Group has concerns about the collection and use of blood from borstal institutions and prisons.
”The group considered this practice to be highly questionable because of the incidence of homosexuals and homosexual activity in prisons and the present unease about the incidence of AIDS among this group of people. The Group asked to be advised of Departmental policy on the practice of collecting and using blood from borstals and prisons.” Note: We have now found definite proof that prison blood was being used by Scottish and English Transfusion Centres. We are concerned to learn that Blood Transfusions Centres in Scotland were taking blood from borstal and prison sources and at least some of the English Blood Transfusions Centres were also receiving blood from these sources. Background: We should point out that serious concerns were raised in the UK in 1980 over the safety of using blood from Scottish prisoners in NHS transfusions - and this was hardly the first warning. There were international warnings from as early as 1958, from Dr. J. Garrott Allen, who after having conducted a survey in the Chicago area, discovered what he referred to as the “prison effect”. We are dismayed to learn that blood was taken from UK prisons and borstal institutions right up until March 1984 - well after prisoners were considered to be high-risk donors. WHY did the Authorities persist with taking blood from prisons? The following is a quote from a document released under FOI: "Furthermore it is socially and psychologically undesirable to exclude prisoners and volunteers from tropical areas from the donor population. Acceptance of prisoners as donors helps to rehabilitate, and some of these volunteers become regular donors after their release." |
Source:
DOH Freedom of Information Documents Released July 2007. Volume 30, page 2. http://www.taintedblood.info/tlfiles/DHSS Letter on Use of Prison Blood 27 July 1983.pdf Type: DHSS Circular from HS1 MB2 Location: Scotland Find related entries |
The collection of blood from prisons and borstal institutions in the United Kingdom continues right up until March 1984, despite repeated warnings that the practice is unsafe. WHY did the Authorities persist with taking blood from prisoners for so long?
Here is a list of just some of the ignored warnings regarding UK prison blood:
Note: We are appalled to learn that the practice of blood collection from UK prisons and borstal institutions continued right up until March 1984 - well after prisoners were considered to be high-risk donors. |
Source:
Definitive Source Pending. (See Find Related Entries link below for additional sources). Type: Possible Date for the Cessation of the Practice of Blood Collection from UK Prisons & Borstal Institutions. Circa March 1984. Location: UK Find related entries |
All rights reserved

